LB 144 Plum Brandy





Observed Satiated Behaviors in Fox Squirrels that Parallel Humans Using E-Cigarettes Correlated to DRD1 Gene









By: [B-123], [B-070], [B-680], [B-207]









LB 144 Organismal Biology

Tuesday, 1:50pm

Ali Kadouh, Maggie Leff, Huda Warsame

11/22/19



http://msu.edu/~jiajason/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pVqNVgVxagQ

     Final Author: [B-123]

























Abstract


     Final Author: [B-123], [B-070], [B-207], [B-680]

     The purpose of this observational study was to explore and compare satiation-response behaviors between humans and fox squirrels and investigate a possible genetic link. Over the course of two months, our team observed squirrels and humans around the campus of Michigan State University and analyzed the satiated behaviors they exhibited. We hypothesize that squirrels and humans exhibit satiation after foraging or smoking because these behaviors stimulate the release of dopamine which is received by dopamine receptors, for which the DRD1 gene is vital to the formation of, and translated into observable feelings of satiation (Misener, 2004). We predict that more satiated behaviors will be observed from squirrels when they are actively foraging based on Trevor Poole's 1997 discussion of animal wellbeing. Studies investigating the release of dopamine while smoking lead us to predict that more satiated behaviors will be observed while humans are actively smoking (Patel, 2011). PCR was used to amplify a target sequence of DRD1 from human saliva samples. We predict to find evidence of DRD1 in humans because we chose previously successful primers and used multiple purified samples (Ostadali, 2004). The amplified DNA was analyzed using a gel electrophoresis test against the GoldBio 100bp ladder. While previous publications exemplify cause-effect relationships between the release of dopamine and satiation responses in humans and squirrels, our studies attempt to contribute a comparison of the responses and develop a more advanced genetic connection through analysis and investigation of the DRD1 gene.





Introduction

     Final Author: [B-123]

     The first fox squirrels (sciurus niger) in Michigan were sighted by Norman A. Wood in 1875, outside his home in Lodi Township, Washtenaw County (Wood, 1922). In the late 1800s-early 1900s, sighting a fox squirrel in Michigan was rare as they were often overshadowed by the abundance of northern gray squirrels in the area, since gray squirrels preferred heavily wooded habitats. However, as deforestation became increasingly common, the population of gray squirrels died down (Wood, 1922). In a study conducted on quadrupedal animals, Robert Kennicott (1857) discovered that the preferred habitat of the fox squirrel is known as oak openings (Kennicott, 1857). These oak openings formed when the glacial lakes; Lake Wayne, Lake Warren, and Lake Lundy drained away as a result of the watershed created during the late Cenozoic era (Forsyth, 1960; Larson and Schaetzl, 2001) and produced sandy soils on which trees would grow (Comer et al, 1995). Comer's (1995) study was focused on constructing digital maps which illustrate pre-settlement vegetation in Michigan with the goal of raising awareness for biodiversity in Michigan and influencing views on land management. Comer's (1995) maps show that a large section of Michigan land are oak openings which correlates with the large population of fox squirrels. Since fox squirrels have become more common, it is important that we understand their behaviors in pursuit of a healthier and safer coexistence between humans and the fox squirrel.

     A 'happy animal' described by Trevor Poole (1997) in his experiment on Eastern grey squirrels found that an animal who is alert and busy and is able to rest in a relaxed manner (Poole, 1997). The cognitive state of fox squirrels is greatly dependent on the social factors and the physical environment around them (Poole, 1997). For example, among the physical environment, loud and sudden noises can cause disruption in their mood (Poole, 1997). A study done by La Morgia (2017) found that squirrels that live around more people were more approachable than the ones who lived in the woods with no human contact. This can be observed through the fox squirrel's alarm system which involves different degrees of specificity in tail signals. Twitches are general; they have no significant stimulus-signal association with predator appearance, manner of approach, or their combinations (Poole, 1996). A moderate stimulus-signal association (such as tail movement) with predator type occured when both appearance and manner of approach differ (McRae and Green, 2014). Compared to squirrels, humans have a more advanced language of expression. In an effort to conduct an evolutionary approach to Charles Darwin's findings on human emotion, a study was conducted by Matsumoto (2008) and colleagues to draw together recent studies on humans facial expressions with Darwin's theories. This study was founded on the notion that facial anatomy expresses a lot of the emotions that a human feels, like when humans feel a sense of joy or happiness their eyes sparkle, wrinkles around their eyes are formed and the corners of the mouth get drawn backward (Matsumoto, 2008).

     Researchers Felce and Perry conducted studies on humans in which they defined satiation as the degree of an individual's perception of their fit between their needs or aspirations and their objective situation (Felce & Perry, 1995). Trevor Poole studied the importance of animal wellbeing and happiness in small mammals, i.e. squirrels (Poole, 1996). Poole concluded that small mammals exhibit their state of satisfaction and satiation as being alert, busy, relaxed, confident, and does not show otherwise abnormal behavior (Poole, 1996). In contrast, squirrels that are agitated or in distress will dart back and forth to warn off potential predators (Gibbens, 2017). Behaviors linked to the release of dopamine in squirrels include most notably collecting and storing nuts, two actions that help ensure this species survival (Moller 1983). Our team predicts that these behaviors are linked to satiated behaviors.Utilizing some of the observational methods and techniques from Sarah Partan and her colleague's in their study of gray squirrels in urban and rural areas, our team investigated eastern fox squirrels on Michigan State University's campus in both 'urban' and 'rural' areas. Our study defined these areas as 'busy' (Beaumont Tower, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI) and 'secluded' (Beal Garden, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI) to examine any potential differences in satiation behavior across differing environments (Partan et al., 2010). In order to test for a homologous behavior in humans, our team focused specifically on the satiation responses of humans during and after the use of electronic cigarettes. As defined by Matsumoto (2008) who analyzed the findings of Charles Darwin (1872) and found that human satiation can often be observed as lip protrusions, partial closure of the eyelids, raising of the upper lip if contempt, eyes sparkling and the skin under the eyes being wrinkled if happy, and the zygomatic and orbicularis muscles contracted when joyful (Matsumoto, 2008). We used these noted human expressions to attempt to quantify human satiation responses during and after the use of electronic cigarettes (E-cigarettes). Our team hypothesizes that more satiated behaviors will be observed after the squirrels and humans perform a known dopamine releasing behavior (foraging and smoking respectively). From our hypothesis we predict that more satiated behaviors will be observed from squirrels in rural areas versus urban areas.

     Because we studied satiation based upon known dopamine releasing behaviors, we decided to investigate the similarities in the reward and pleasure systems in our two test species. We discovered that humans and rats (close relative of squirrels) share a family of genes, the Dopamine Receptor (DR) family, that code for dopamine receptors in the brain. Dopamine receptors are abundant in and vital to the function of reward system structures such as the Nucleus Accumbens (NAcc) and Ventral Tegmental Area (VTA) in humans (Lee et al, 2006)(Malenka et al, 2009). We investigated the Dopamine Receptor D1 (DRD1) gene specifically because it is the most abundant of the family in these parts of the brain (Weiner et al, 1991). The known dopamine releasing behaviors that we studied were the collection and processing of food by squirrels and nicotine intake by humans. Both actions stimulate the release of dopamine and therefore the stimulation and use of dopamine receptors in the respective species (Moller, 1983) (Comings et al, 1996). Given that we were not able to find concrete and explicit evidence of DRD1 presence in squirrels as we could in humans, we attempted to bolster our assumption of DRD1 presence in squirrels by conducting DNA purification, PCR amplification, and gel electrophoresis testing for DRD1 gene on both human and fox squirrel tissue samples. Our team hypothesizes that both humans and squirrels would carry the DRD1 gene based on previous PCR diagnostic testing (Ostadali et al., 2004;Lee et al., 2006).










Methods


     Final Author: [B-207]

     Fox Squirrel Observation

     Materials:

     Fox squirrels were observed performing their defined satiation behaviors at two locations on Michigan State University's campus that varied in their business and foot traffic (Partan et al., 2010). These were Beal Garden south of the Main Library and the area surrounding Beaumont Tower. No observations were made during poor weather conditions such as heavy rain or snow. Observations were focused to a single squirrel at a time by a videographer using one of the cameras listed above. The video was later analyzed for potential dopamine releasing behaviors and satiation related behaviors. Observations were made as frequently as possible though totaling at least ten minutes per week from late September to early November 2019. Higher resolution cameras were used when possible though most videos were taken by team members with their personal cell phones. Most observations were made in the evening when squirrels were more active (Partan et al., 2010).

     Human Observation

     Human observation methods mirrored a previous study on smoking performed by Vimal Patel and his team in 2011 that observed humans in a satiated state (Patel, 2011). Two observers positioned a GoPro Hero 5 and a Canon 60D near the intersection of M.A.C. Avenue and East Grand River Avenue in East Lansing, Michigan on either side of the street to record every person that walked through the sampling frame (Patel et al, 2011). This study area was chosen due to its close proximity to multiple smoke shops and high pedestrian traffic flow. Observers positioned themselves in a way that would not alert subjects in the frame. Times that smoking behavior was observed were logged in the field and analyzed later (Patel et al, 2011). The sampling frame was altered to not include people in vehicles and children. Children were defined as anyone who appeared to be twelve years old or younger. Smoking was defined as anyone observed holding an e-cigarette in their hand or mouth.

     DNA Purification

     Materials:

     Purification methods were copied directly from IDT's Cheek Cell mtDNA Isolation and Purification though similar methods were found in David Sweet's work on DNA extraction (Sweet et. al, 1998). Human saliva samples were collected from multiple participants before being poured into a 15 mL sterile tube to settle for 15-20 minutes. Samples were aliquoted into 2mL microcentrifuge tubes and spun at full speed for about 5 minutes to allow the cells to cluster at the bottom of the tube. Excess liquid was drained off and 100uL Chelex resin was added to each tube. The tubes were then placed in a hot water bath for 10 minutes then placed on ice for about 3 minutes before being centrifuged again to pull out the chelated contaminates. DNA containing liquid was then transferred to clean tubes and placed on ice. DNA concentration in the purified sample was measured using a NanoDrop spectrophotometer. Samples were frozen between uses.

     PCR

     Ingredients and respective concentrations were derived from PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications (Innis, 2012). Forward primer 5'-AAACCCACAAGCCCCTCTGA-3' and reverse primer 5'-GATGAATTAGCCCACCCAAAC-3' were found in Mohammadreza Ostadali and colleague's work on dopamine receptor genes (Ostadali, 2004). A mixture of 15 ug purified DNA, 2.0 ug each primer, 2.0 ug DNTP mix, and 0.5 ug of taq polymerase were mixed in a small test tube and placed in a thermal cycler to run 35 cycles of 30s at 95°C denaturation (5 min initial denaturation), 45s at 50°C annealing, and 30s at 68°C extension (5 min final extension) (Peake, 1999). This process was repeated with different purified DNA samples for a total of three trials. The annealing temperature was calculated to be roughly 3-5°C below the lower melting temperature of the two primers (Wu, 2012), which were given by the primer manufacturer.

     Gel Electrophoresis

     Materials:

     Agarose powder and 2.5mL of LB solution were mixed in an erlenmeyer flask with 47.5mL DI water to dilute to a 1x LB and 1% agarose by weight solution. The flask was then heated in a microwave to near boil then set aside to cool. 5.0uL of SYBR dye was added and mixed into the solution and the dyed solution was poured into a gel mold with comb and left to set. Once set, the gel was placed into the electrophoresis chamber and the remaining 15mL LB solution was diluted to 1x concentration and poured into the apparatus just enough to cover the gel. 5 uL DNA ladder was then pipetted into the leftmost well and 10 uL of the PCR product into the adjacent well(s) before closing the chamber and running at 170V for 10-15 minutes. The second and third trials were run separately from the first, but under the same conditions. The finalized gels were placed in UV light for better viewing.

     Data Analysis

     Both human and squirrel subjects were filmed on site to be analyzed afterward. Squirrel videos were analyzed by second to be showing one of the following behaviors: Scampering, Foraging, Searching, Burying, Chewing/Eating, Alert, Fleeing, or In Tree to display the relative abundance of these behaviors as observed. These behaviors were elaborations of the behaviors defined by Trevor Poole in Happy animals make good science. These are alertness, business, foraging, relaxed state, and abnormal behavior (Poole, 1997). Videos were split into 30 second intervals in which the subject was assessed to either exhibit or to not exhibit each of these behaviors. These totals were then split by the location the data was collected, displaying similarities and differences in behavior between locations (Partan et al., 2010). To compare the relationship between our dopamine releasing behavior (foraging) and our satiation related response (relaxed state), a Chi square test of independence was performed with variables Foraging/Not Foraging and Relaxed/Not Relaxed.

     Human subject videos were split into pre/during/post smoking action segments and the presence of satiation related facial movements and positions defined by Charles Darwin and discussed by David Matsumoto (Matsumoto et al, 2008). These included: lip protrusion, mouth open, laughing, purposeless movements, nose wrinkled, skin under eyes wrinkled, upper lip raised, partial closure of eyelids, turning away eyes, and mouth drawn back at corners. Number of occurrences of these behaviors was recorded for each interval for each recorded instance of smoking and displayed on a bar graph.

     Gel electrophoresis results were analyzed from a still photo of the gel by recording the number of pixels along the image each band had traveled. Migration distance of each rung of the ladder was plotted with its respective size on a semi-log plot along with an exponential best fit equation. Migration distances of test lane bands were compared to the ladder plot with this equation.






Results

     Final Author: [B-680]

    

     Fox squirrels showed different frequencies of the same satiated behaviors in urban versus secluded areas. For both rural and urban squirrels, the most abundant behavior was busyness; thirty for urban and twenty-two for secluded squirrels. For alertness, we see sixteen squirrels in the secluded area, and nine squirrels in the urban location. In both the secluded and urban area we observe fifteen squirrels foraging. Thirteen secluded squirrels show the relaxed satiated behavior versus six from the urban squirrels observed, indicating that fox squirrels in secluded areas are more relaxed with their surroundings. Both exhibited abnormal behavior, which included tail flicking, however secluded had more observations than urban (Figure 1B).

     Scampering was considered general movement with frequent stops, foraging was observed as the squirrel searching in the ground or has not found food. Searching was deduced as having a nut and looking for a place to bury it, and fleeing was running away from an observed threat. Burying and searching, which are both indicators of foraging, were the most prevalent, at 20.8% and 24.8%. Most squirrels were observed on the ground, however, 17.3% of squirrels observed displayed these behaviors up in a tree (Figure 2A). A graph was created to analyze the dopamine releasing behaviors in squirrels (Figure 2B) . Foraging and relaxed behaviors were one of the major satiated behaviors observed in squirrels (Poole, 1997). A comparison was made between foraging and relaxing among squirrels. Thirty one squirrels were observed to be foraging, eight squirrels were relaxed and ten were observed to be exhibit both behaviors. A Chi Squared test was performed comparing these two satiated behaviors, and later a t-statistic was calculated giving a p value of 0.5238, which gives very little evidence that foraging and relaxing in squirrels is related to each other.

     Humans appear to exhibit satiated behaviors while smoking and after smoking. The footage was reviewed by a pair of researchers who were trained to recognize satiated behaviors. A total of fourteen pedestrians were observed to be smoking and ten different behaviors were observed. Those behaviors were: lip protrusion, mouth open, laughing, purposeless movements, nose wrinkled, skin under eyes wrinkled, upper lip raised, partial closure of eyelids, turning away eyes, and mouth drawn back at the corners. There were twelve occurrences of satiated behaviors observed during the pre-smoking phase, thirty five were observed while smoking, and sixteen were observed during the post-smoking phase (Figure 3a). Laughing, mouth open, and lip protrusion were frequently observed over other behaviors. Partial closure of eyelids and upper lip raised were only observed in the during phase. Based on the data, a greater number of satiated behaviors were observed from the during and post phases. Evidently, there is a relation between smoking and satiated behavior in humans.

     PCR amplification and gel electrophoresis tests were conducted to find evidence of DRD1 gene in humans. The Gold Bio 100 bp Ladder shows an especially bright 500bp band as seen in well C (Figure 4A). The ladder migration from our first gel is shown (Figure 4B), which was discarded because no band showed up and is not shown. The best fit line is modeled by the equation y = 2442e^-0.0323x. Lane B shows a smear that was likely a result of sample denaturing before amplification (Figure 4A). A bright band appears in lane A near 500 bp, implying the amplification was successful. The equation derived from the first gel image cannot be used to test the validity of our results in the second gel.






References


Final Author: [B-123]



     Bumler, M., Vlk, A., Burge, J., and Wilson, K., (2016) Observational study showing agonistic behavior of Midwestern birds and humans related to temperature variation http://35.9.122.10/online-manuscripts/birds-agonisticbehavior/

     Comer, P.J., D.A. Albert, H.A. Wells, B.L. Hart, J.B. Raab, D.L. Price, D.M. Kashian, R.A. Corner & D.W. Schuen (map interpretation); T.R. Leibfreid, M.B. Austin, C.J. DeLain, L. Prange-Gregory, L.J. Scrimger, K.M. Korroch, & JG. Spitzley (digital map production). 1995. Michigan's Presettlement Vegetation, as Interpreted from the General Land Office Surveys 1816-1856. Michigan Natural Features Inventory, Lansing, MI. digital map.

     Comings, D. E., Ferry, L., Bradshaw-Robinson, S., Burchette, R., Chiu, C., & Muhleman, D. (1996). The dopamine D2 receptor (DRD2) gene: a genetic risk factor in smoking. Pharmacogenetics, 6(1), 73'79. doi: 10.1097/00008571-199602000-00006

     Felce, D., & Perry, J. (1995). Quality of life: Its definition and measurement. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 16(1), 51-74.

     Forsyth, J. L., & Carney, F. L. (1960). The beach ridges of northern Ohio. Columbus: Division of Geological Survey.

     Garibyan, L. and N. Avashia. 2013. Research Techniques made Simple: Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR). J Invest Dermatol. 133(3): 1-8.

     Kennicott, R., & Holmes, E. (1857). The quadrupeds of Illinois: injurious and beneficial to the farmer. Washington: Cornelius Wendell, printer.

     La Morgia, V. , Paoloni, D. and Genovesi, P. (2017), Eradicating the grey squirrel Sciurus carolinensis from urban areas: an innovative decision making approach based on lessons learnt in Italy. Pest. Manag. Sci., 73: 354-363. doi:10.1002/ps.4352

     Larson, G., & Schaetzl, R. (2001). Origin and Evolution of the Great Lakes. Journal of Great Lakes Research, 27(4), 518'546. doi: 10.1016/s0380-1330(01)70665-x

     Lee, K., Kim, Y., Kim A. M., Helmin, K., Nairn, A. C., and Greengard, P., (2006) Cocaine-induced dendritic spine formation in D1 and D2 dopamine receptor-containing medium spiny neurons in nucleus accumbens, PNAS, vol 103, pg. 3399-3404 https://www.pnas.org/content/pnas/103/9/3399.full.pdf

     Malenka, R. C., Nestler, E, J., Hyman, S.E., (2009). Sydor A, Brown RY (eds.). Molecular Neuropharmacology: A Foundation for Clinical Neuroscience (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Medical. pp. 147'148, 367, 376. ISBN 978-0-07-148127-4

     Matsumoto, D., Keltner, D., Shiota, M. N., O'Sullivan, M., & Frank, M. (2008). Facial expressions of emotion. In M. Lewis, J. M. Haviland-Jones, & L. F. Barrett (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (pp. 211-234). New York, NY, US: The Guilford Press.

     McRae, Thaddeus., Green, Steven. (2014). Joint tail and vocal alarm signals of gray squirrels. Behaviour 151, 10 (2014) ; 10.1163/1568539X-00003194

     Misener, Virginia & Luca, P & Azeke, O & Crosbie, Jennifer & Waldman, Irwin & Tannock, Rosemary & Roberts, Wendy & Malone, Molly & Schachar, Russell & Ickowicz, Abel & Kennedy, J & Barr, C. (2004). Linkage of the dopamine receptor D1 gene to attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Molecular Psychiatry. 9. 10.1038/sj.mp.4001440.

     Mohammad Reza Ostadali, Ghasem Ahangari, Mohammad Bagher Eslami, Alireza Razavi, Mohammad Reza Zarrindast, Hamid Reza Ahmadkhaniha, & Jafar Boulhari ",. (1). The Detection of Dopamine Gene Receptors (DRD1-DRD5) Expression on Human Peripheral Blood Lymphocytes by Real Time PCR. Iranian Journal of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology, 3(4), 169-174. Retrieved from http://ijaai.tums.ac.ir/index.php/ijaai/article/view/86

     Moller, H. (1983). Foods and foraging behaviour of Red (Sciurus vulgaris) and Grey (Sciurus carolinensis) squirrels. Mammal Review, 13(2-4), 81–98. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2907.1983.tb00270.x

     Sweet, D., Lorente, M., Valenzuela, A., Lorente, J. A., & Alvarez, J. C. (1998, January 5). Increasing DNA extraction yield from saliva stains with a modified Chelex method. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0379073896020348.

     Partan, S. R., Fulmer, A. G., Gounard, M. A. M., & Redmond, J. E. (2010). Multimodal alarm behavior in urban and rural gray squirrels studied by means of observation and a mechanical robot. Current Zoology, 56(3), 313–326. doi: 10.1093/czoolo/56.3.313

     Patel, V., Thomson, G., & Wilson, N. (2011). Objective measurement of area differences in private smoking behaviour: observing smoking in vehicles. Tobacco Control, 22(2), 130'135. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050119

     Poole, T. (1997). Happy animals make good science. Laboratory Animals, 31(2), 116'124. doi: 10.1258/002367797780600198

     Weiner, D.M., Levey A.I.,Sunahara R.K., Niznik H.B., O'Dowd B. F., Seeman P., and Brann, M. R., (1991) D1 and D2 dopamine receptor mRNA in rat brain, PNAS, vol 88, pp.1859-1863, https://www.pnas.org/content/pnas/88/5/1859.full.pdf

     Wood, N. A. (1922). The Mammals of Washtenaw County, Michigan. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.

     Wu, W., Trinh, K. T. L., & Lee, N. Y. (2012). Flow-through PCR on a 3D qiandu-shaped polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) microdevice employing a single heater: toward microscale multiplex PCR. The Analyst, 137(9), 2069. doi: 10.1039/c2an35077g









Figures

Final Author: [B-070]


A.Figure 1a B.Figure 1b



Figure 1: A. Map of the data collection locations for observations of satiated behaviors displayed by squirrels on Michigan State University's campus. Represents observational study area where the research was conducted . The red circle represents the busy/urban location with high traffic around Beaumont Tower and the blue circle represents rural location with low traffic around River Trail of Michigan State University's campus where squirrels were observed. Observations in both locations were conducted at the same time each week. The squirrels were video recorded for further analysis by video playback. B. Observed satiated behaviors of Fox Squirrels. Observations were conducted at Michigan State University alongside River Trail south of the main library and near Beaumont Tower as the secluded and urban areas, respectively on September 18th, 21st, 24th, 27th, and October 3rd, 10th, 17th, 24th, 30th, 2019. This data was collected to compare the different behaviors of squirrels in a busy and rural area using a Canon 60D camera and then determining the frequency of each satiated behavior represented by the squirrels observed.The frequency of each specific behavior in each location were recorded and displayed in the figure. The traits include busy, alert, foraging, relaxed, and any abnormal behaviors, such as tail flicking. Error bars were calculated to show standard error and statistical significance. For busy, alert, and relaxed variables, there is strong evidence that observed satatied behaviors in fox squirrels is dependent on location due to p< 0.05.



A.Figure 2a   B.Figure 2b
C.  Figure 2c
D.Figure 2d   Figure 1d   Figure 1e   Figure 1f



Figure 2: A. Relative frequency of various squirrel behaviors in both urban and secluded locations. Detailed analysis of video recordings from both urban and secluded locations. Observations were conducted at Michigan State University alongside River Trail south of the main library and near Beaumont Tower from late September to early November, 2019. Chart shows relative number of total seconds observed of unmanipulated squirrel subjects performing each defined behavior. Data of observations was obtained through viewing video playback and documenting behaviors in a formatted google sheet. Searching (for a place to bury nuts) and burying were both observed most abundantly. Data includes a combination of both squirrels in secluded and urban locations and are represented in a pie distribution. B. Relationship between observed foraging and relaxed state. Each video was split into 30 second intervals and each interval was assessed to either show or not show a dopamine releasing behavior (foraging) or dopamine response (relaxation). Chart derived from matrix used to calculate Chi square independence test. Test statistic is X^2=0.4065 with p=.5238, implying little evidence that the two variables are related. C. Visual representation of the overlap in behaviors observed. Of 39 intervals in which either foraging or relaxed behaviors were observed, 21 contain no relaxed behaviors, 8 contain no foraging behaviors, and only 10 contain both foraging and relaxed behaviors. D. Behaviors observed from fox squirrels. From left to right: foraging, busyness, searching, alert.




A.Figure 3a
B.Figure 3b Figure 3c




Figure 3: A. Number of satiated behaviors observed from humans in pre-smoking, during smoking, and post-smoking phases. Data was collected through a video recording of the northeast corner at the intersection of M.A.C. Avenue and Albert Street in East Lansing for a total of one hour and 30 minutes. The cameras used include a GoPro Hero 5 and a Canon 60D. Data was collected on a Google Sheets spreadsheet and formatted into a bar graph. The Y-axis is based on the relation to smoking, and the X-axis is the number of occurrences observed. After an extensive review by a pair of researchers, a total of 14 pedestrians were observed to be smoking. There were 10 types of behaviors recorded and a total of 63 instances of satiated behaviors were observed with some pedestrians frequently exhibiting more than one satiated behavior at a time. In the pre-smoking phase, 12 behavior occurrences were observed, during there were 35 occurrences, and post there were 16 occurrences. This data provides evidence towards the fact that smoking is a dopamine releasing activity and that satiated behaviors are observed when someone is smoking. B. Facial expressions observed from humans. Visual examples of human facial expressions pre-smoking and during.



A.Figure 4a B.Figure 4b




Figure 4: A. Gel results after PCR amplification and agarose gel electrophoresis of DRD1 gene (471 bp) in h. Sapiens alongside control ladder. Observations of a single distinct SYBR died band in each lane (Garibyan et al, 2013) lining up with 471 bp on the ladder were recorded (Ostadali et. al., 2004), implying DRD1 presence in humans. For amplifying the human DRD1 gene, a primer that was 20 base pairs long was used, with a forward primer sequence of 5'-AAACCCACAAGCCCCTCTGA-3', and a reverse primer sequence of 5'-GATGAATTAGCCCACCCAAAC-3'(Ostadali et. al., 2014).Wells A and B both contained extracted human cheek DNA samples after cycled 35 times. Each of these cycles in PCR involved 1 minute of denaturation, which occurred at 95 degrees Celsius, one minute of annealing at 50 degrees Celsius, one and a half minute extension at 68 degrees Celsius, and 10 minutes of elongation at 72 degrees Celsius. It is predicted that well B had a procedural error in purifying the DNA, which possibly denatured the sample causing discrepant data.In the agarose gel, Well C contained the Gold Bio 100 base pair ladder solution, serving as a control and is comprised of a known segment sizes ranging from 500 bp to 1500 bp. This experiment displays the location of the DRD1 gene approximately from viewing the band with the highest intensity at 471 base pairs, verifying previous experimentation, and providing a foundation for further testing on fox squirrel DRD1 gene presence and location to bolster argument of DRD1 presence in fox squirrels (Garibyan et al, 2013). B. Migration distance traveled through agarose gel based on molecular size (base pairs). Measured the distance traveled (in pixels) of the bands through gel after conducting a PCR test. The position of the DRD1 gene in humans and fox squirrels is estimated at 471 base pairs (roughly 120 pixels) of the Gold Bio 100 base pair ladder. The trendline is shown depicting a semi log correlation of molecular size and migration distance and overall direction of the data.Well A DRD1 gene location is included since it is the most clear visual compared to well B.










Figure 5: Plum Brandy's Research Video