Detection of the A467T Mutation on the
POLG Gene in IB3 Epithelial Cells by
Allele Specific PCR and Gel
Electrophoresis
By: Ashwin Easow, Brooke Hagen, Alyssa Kirsch, and Alexander Lyons
LB 145 Cell and Molecular Biology
Tuesday and Thursday 7PM
Eric Gurzell,
Tim Oja, Rachel Rinaldi
4/23/2013
Abstract
The
purpose of the research was to test published and customized primers with
genomic DNA of wild-type and mutant patients through PCR amplification and gel
electrophoresis to ultimately diagnose AlpersÕ
disease. Published primers were provided by Dr. Naviaux
to test if we could replicate his results in identifying the point mutation.
Bands did appear in the replication study, but failed to be identified in the correct
base pair region. We designed our own forward and reverse primers: wild type Fprimer 1, mutant type Fprimer 2,
and Rprimer. They were created by complementary base
pairing to template DNA. The A467T mutation would be detected if a band
appeared at 518bp when Fprimer 2 was run with mutant
type DNA, while the normal DNA sequence would be detected if a band appeared at
518bp when Fprimer 1 was run with wild type DNA. Both
forward primers were run with the reverse primer, and wild type DNA template at
an annealing temperature of 59¡C. A base pair length of 518bp was expected for Fprimer 1, but appeared at 125bp. In the AlpersÕ Disease Symptom Project (ADSP), all members were
required to live with replicated symptoms of AlpersÕ
disease to understand the physical, sociological, and mental aspects of the
disease. Symptoms included blindness, stiff joints, and inability to walk for a
total of a month. Fitness was tested by taking a presidential
fitness test every week. Since movement and vision were both lost,
adjusting to the symptoms would be difficult and require assistance to
function. The psychological effects of the challenge were evident after taking
the Hamilton Depression Scale, where the rate of depression increased between
pre and post experiments due to the hardships. The sociological aspect was
conducted by recording the number of adverse reactions that bystanders
expressed at the locations of Holmes, Hubbard, Brody, and Grand River. A Chi
Squared Test was conducted and showed that there was a significant difference
in Brody and Grand River. Significance of this research will allow further
research on developing efficient primers and show that more sentimental care is
needed by the public to reduce stress that the symptoms provide.
Discussion
Before
working with IB3 epithelial cells, Lambda DNA was used as a control. We
amplified the Lambda virus Rz gene using 1% agarose
gel electrophoresis. With this control, we predicted the wild type primers to
bind the wild type DNA. Our forward primer 5Õ GATGTATGAGCAGAGTCACCGCGAT 3Õ and
reverse primer 5Õ GAGGGTGAAATAATCCCGTTCAG 3Õ were used to bind to the wild type
Rz gene. A DNA cocktail was put together and ran for
30 cycles, annealing at 65¡C for 46 seconds. The gel was run for 30 minutes at
103 volts. At these conditions, the PCR was successful showing one band which infers the primers bound successfully. The Lambda
virus Rz gene was successfully amplified around 500
base pairs.
With
our A467T mutation, we found Dr. Naviaux, who
conducted similar research to the A467T mutation we were trying to amplify.
Using his published primers we ran PCR and gel electrophoresis. The primers we
used included: the forward primer 5Õ-
GTC TTG CCT CCT GTG GTC ATT TAT 3Õ and the reverse
primer 5Õ- CAC CCA TGC TCC CCA CCT TTC CT 3Õ. For PCR, we ran 10 tubes
containing a different cocktail in order to see if adjusting the amount of
buffer, taq or DNA would lead to success in amplifying the A467T mutation. In
the first and second tube, we put 3uL of DNA and doubled the PCR to 10uL. The
tubes were run using PCR for 35 cycles with Tube 1 annealing at 50¡C and Tube 2 at 53.8¡C each for 40
seconds. Tubes 5 and 6 were run in PCR for 35
cycles with Tube 5 annealing at 50¡C for 40 seconds and Tube 6 annealing at
53.8¡C for 40 seconds. As shown in Figure 2, bands were apparent at 503 bp (as suggested in Dr. NaviauxÕs
publication); however, non-specific binding was present. With detectable bands,
this meant that doubling the amount of PCR buffer was effective. Having more buffer may have been beneficial to the cocktail by keeping
the pH more stable during PCR and allowing the primers to anneal better. This
may be because of ÒThe basic underlying observation that standard PCR buffers
prevent chromatin solubilization during thermal
cycling while more loosely organized chromatin can be amplifiedÓ (Vatolin).
As for the other wells, we varied the amount of taq and DNA
included in each cocktail. With an increase of taq, that seemed to not help
with binding since no bands were present in the wells where the taq was
increased. The concentration of agarose may have been higher in that area
making it harder for the DNA to run. The amount of DNA did not seem to matter
since bands were evident when using both 1uL and 3uL. As for the non-specific
binding, this could have been due to running it at a lower temperature and
shorter times. Since we had to share the thermocycler,
it did not allow everyone to run their PCR
independently of one another, and we were unable to run it for the full time
suggested in his publication.
For
our customized primers, we used complementary base pairing to amplify the A467T
mutation. This differs from the standard method that we used due to not
specifically analyzing a place for the mutation to be. The primers used to
amplify the mutation were 5ÕAGAAGTCGTTGATGGATCTGGCC 3Õ for the forward and 5Õ TTGAAACTCCTCCTCCTCACTGC 3Õ for the
reverse. Similar to running our published primers, we had 9 tubes with
different cocktails to increase the chances of getting bands. In the 3rd
and 4th tube, we changed the annealing temperatures for the tubes as
well. Tube 3 had its annealing period for 40 seconds at 50¡C whereas tube 4 was at 53.8¡C for the same amount of time.
In addition, tubes 7 and 8 contained 1uL of DNA, 10 uL of PCR buffer. Tube 7
had its annealing temperature at 50¡C and tube 8 had an annealing temperature
of 53.8¡C for 40 seconds. With these lowered temperatures, we increased the
chances of binding to occur. If the temperature was
too high then bands would not be visible. The 1% agarose gel was run at 108
volts for 30 minutes. Bands were expected to show up at 518 base pairs however
this ended up not being the case. Some bands were visible however the bands
showed up around 120 base pairs. This was determined due to conducting a semi
log plot. The most vibrant bands were in well 3, 5, and 6
which contained Tubes 4, 7 and 8. However, non-specific binding was
present. In these wells the PCR buffer was doubled. The buffer could have
stabilized the pH during denature and annealing which may have contributed to
binding. In addition, the PCR buffer provides chromatin solubiliztion
during PCR so that more loosely chromatin can be amplifiedÓ (Vatolin).
In addition bands showed up in wells 8,9,10 and 12. In these
wells, the cocktail contained doubled taq. However, more taq seemed to not have
the same results as the buffer. Yet, with increased taq, bands were
semi-visible due to it enabling the amplification reaction to be performed at
higher temperatures which significantly improves the specificity, yield,
sensitivity, and length of products that can be amplified (Saiki et al, 1988).
As for mutant primers binding with wild-type DNA, the forward sequence was 5ÕAGAAGTCGTTGATGGATCTGACC 3Õ along with
the reverse which is 5Õ TTGAAACTCCTCCTCCTCACTGC 3Õ. The only difference is the
intentional base-pair change to ACC at the 3Õ end. With these primers used
together, no bands were present. This is due to the base-pair mismatch.
For
genomic purification we were giving 1,000,000 IB3 epithelial cells to purify.
This is to remove the proteins and such to leave just nucleic acids. We were
given 3 tubes of DNA due to the cells being liced or
not preserving the cells the proper way. DNA broke out of cell, which is why
when following the procedure, and running genomic purification there was no DNA
in the tube. However, for the third tube of DNA we spun the cells down, yet
there was a white, sticky substance on the side that we were not sure of. We
took the substance and ran genomic purification on it using the Epoch and found
it was DNA. For this DNA, our 280 value was .004 and
.005. The 280 value is the concentration of the
protein in milligrams per milliliter. The aromatic amino acids in proteins
absorb strongly at 280 mg/mL. As for the 260/280
values, we got 1.789 and 1.537. The values should be around 1.8. With numbers
higher than this value suggests that it is ready for analysis. However a lower
number may mean that there is protein contamination (Oxford Gene Technology,
2013).
In
our first week of the AlpersÕ Disease Symptom
Project, we first took a HamiltonÕs depression test to see where we stood
before experiencing this disease. With this test, we wanted to see if having
these symptoms would create a drastic increase of depression. We predicted each
week our scores to increase, and by the end, have severe depression. For the
first week, our average of 9.2 revealed little depression, which may be due to
college stress and other circumstances. In addition to this depression test, we
took an adult presidential fitness test. The test was taken
the first week as a control to compare to the following weeks and monitor the
affect the symptoms have our physical activity. Our average for the first week was in the 45 percentile.
Moreover, we went to Holmes, Hubbard, Brody and Grand River to do the
sociological part of the project. We observed the amount of people who gave us
negative reactions or stared. The first week was set as the control to base our
results on. When taking the Hamilton test again at the end of the week, the
average increased to 13.3. Frustration of mobility was starting to arise which
may have caused the increase of depression. In addition, the depression could
have been getting worse due to social aspects. We predicted many stares due to
curiosity and more adverse reactions the further we got from Holmes. Brody was
where the most people were observed staring, these students gave judgmental
looks as well as made negative comments. Around Holmes this was noticed less.
This could be due to people knowing it is for a Lyman Briggs class or were
having to live with their disease as well. We did the fitness test again as
well. We placed dramatically lower in the percentile of physical activity. Due
to stiff joints it was harder to run and increased our time by over 10 minutes.
For pushups we could not bend our elbows so our numbers were all lower than 5.
The average for the second week of testing was in the 15th
percentile. For the third week our disease symptoms progressed by having vision
impairment. Getting the full affect of someone who lives with AlpersÕ disease correlated with the severity of depression.
When we took the Hamilton test for the third time at the end of the week, our
score averaged 15.2. This score is having a positive correlation with the
number of people who exhibited staring. With the constant stares and the
frustration with not being able to see the area around was, as well as the
upcoming pain from the stiff joints explains why our depression is increasing.
Moreover, the ability of partial blindness made us trust our peers and others
around us. As for taking the physical test with the beginning of deterioration
of our muscles, we were placed in the 5th percentile. The physical
test consisted of walking, instead of running, which was lead by one of the
other members due to vision impairment. Also, this made doing the other
activities very difficult. For the fourth week, our disease progressed to the
fullest effect of not being able to walk at all in addition to the other
symptoms. A wheel chair was added which made transportation even more
difficult. To leave buildings, wheelchair accessible exits had to be found, as
well as going up and down ramps. Our predictions of frustration and desire to
go back to a normal lifestyle were proved evident within this period. Our final
depression score jumped all the way to 21.7. This score represents severe
depression according to the Hamilton depression scale. Moreover, incorporating
the wheel chair drew more attention to ourselves and
increased our observed numbers. As for our symptoms reaching an all-time high,
we dropped down to the 2 percentile for physical activity.
Future Directions
Dr.
NaviauxÕs study differed from our own in that they
focused on more than just AlpersÕ disease as the
result of the A467T mutation. For instance, it is wondered if the heterozygous
A467T mutation is any less prominent than the homozygous A467T mutation when
ran through PCR with the accurate primers. A question that was unable to be
answered in Chan, Longley, and CopelandÕs work was the specifics of the
mechanism by which the A467T mutation affects DNA polymerase activity. Since
this mutation is the focus of the study the researchers are performing, it
perhaps would be a good topic for future research. In addition, this research
could continue by creating more primers and this time using the Yaku-Bonzyk method which would
give us more specific bands. The Yaku-Bonczyk method
designs the third base pair from the 3Õ end as an intentional mismatch that
will never anneal to either mutant or wild-type DNA (Yaku
et al, 2008). Our customized primers didnÕt work because our base-pairs were
not specific which is why our bands were not specific. Using the Yaku-Bonzyk method could give us a better chance of getting
specific binding and our primers binding successfully to amplify the A467T
mutation. There is little research being done on AlpersÕ
disease so it is still in its premature stages. To redesign our project, we
would not do anything with POLG due to lack of knowledge about it. Finding a
mutation that is more common may allows us to have a better understanding of
the background behind it.
Figures
AlpersÕ Disease Symptom Project (ADSP) Video- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GXX1QkUhCzk